Minor issues:
I too think the rationale is important but the phrasing may be confusing. Being a native speaker of U.S. English (and almost fluent in Southern Californiaese ;-) I found the colloquialisms confusing. Perhaps I could suggest something in the vein of "very important" or "much desired feature" etc for "killer". I found the term "bosses" leaving much to interpretation and would prefer to see something more like "management" or "decision maker", or perhaps even "Corporate" used instead.Rationale: support for wireless transit links is a "killer feature" of Homenet, something that is requested by our users and easy to explain to our bosses. In the absence of dynamicallySB> Not sure explicability to your boss counts for much as a basis for SB> a feature an international standard. I think this paragraph is helpful for implementors -- it helps people explain to their bosses why we're bothering with link-quality estimation when we've done routing protocols with no link-quality estimation for the last fifty years or so. (The Fuzzball LSI-11 router had link-quality estimation, but that was in the 1980s.) Still, if you find the tone too informal, I'm open to reformulating.
Jeff Bowden
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
