Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> >> I hate to ask this, but it seems like we ought to have a definition 
for a
    >> >> managed network... :-(
    >> >> I think that the section 2.1 provides contrasts, but maybe we should 
instead
    >> >> say what aspects of the Managed LAN we care about.
    >> 
    >> > Good point.  The "including the ability to publish services on the
    >> > Internet" seems like a reasonable first attempt at specifying that, but
    >> > I agree that it's insufficient.   Do you have a theory to offer?   What
    >> > I think I meant by this was:
    >> 
    >> A managed network is one that has a (human) manager, or operator.
    >> The operator has authority over the network, and the authority to 
publish names
    >> in a forward DNS tree, and reverse names in the reverse tree.
    >> The operator has the authority to sign the respective trees with DNSSEC,
    >> and acquire TLS certificates for hosts/servers within the network.

    > This prompts a few thoughts:

    > (1) There's a strong resemblance between a homenet and a small office
    > network, in which there's quite likely to be a human who is supposedly
    > in charge of the network as a minor part of their job. That may well be
    > a human who has the authority but not the skills. So there's possibly
    > a category of "badly managed network" to consider.

Yes, so there are badly managed small office networks, and unmanaged small
office networks (using homenet technology).

    > (2) I note the "(human)". Actually some of the concepts of autonomics
    > and intent-based networking may spill over from enterprise networks
    > into SOHO, at some point in the future.

I think that it's a grey area, but I'm okay with claiming that the autonomic
network had a human operator write the Intent.

    > So, the naming system may end up being fully automatic, well or badly
    > managed by a human, or managed autonomically.

I realize reading this that the autonomic network is much like the autonomous
vehicle:  Something we aspire to get right, and to do so in order to
avoid/reduce human errors.   (Are the autonomous vehicle people
ahead of the autonomic network people? Not sure)

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     [email protected]  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [ 
        

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to