Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > progress the stub networks draft because I've been too busy doing dnssd > work, but that would be an example. I'd really like to progress that draft > /somewhere/, and it seems a /bit/ off-topic for dnssd. It could go in > v6ops, but it's pretty off-topic for v6ops. Same with intarea.
> But of course the stub networks document isn't what Homenet set out to do.
> It's just a building block that might lead there. The original work of
> homenet doesn't seem to have caught on in the market, and I think it's
> because we didn't have an adoption strategy. Personally I think stub
> networks is a good bottom-up beginning to a strategy that could ultimately
> produce an adoptable version of what we originally tried to do. But again,
> only if people here want to pursue that.
I thought that you *wanted* to go to INTAREA with this document.
I agree that it's an important document.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
