Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: >> progress the stub networks draft because I've been too busy doing >> dnssd work, but that would be an example. I'd really like to progress >> that draft /somewhere/, and it seems a /bit/ off-topic for dnssd. It >> could go in v6ops, but it's pretty off-topic for v6ops. Same with >> intarea.
>> But of course the stub networks document isn't what Homenet set out to
>> do. It's just a building block that might lead there. The original
>> work of homenet doesn't seem to have caught on in the market, and I
>> think it's because we didn't have an adoption strategy. Personally I
>> think stub networks is a good bottom-up beginning to a strategy that
>> could ultimately produce an adoptable version of what we originally
>> tried to do. But again, only if people here want to pursue that.
> I thought that you *wanted* to go to INTAREA with this document. I
> agree that it's an important document.
If we need to keep HOMENET open to do stub networks, then let's do that.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
