I share the sentiment expressed by Gary Driggs but am restricted by
time.  I've has the impression the the project's relevance is limited
(to researchers) *because* it hasn't been updated.  

Is there an opportunity here, for those who may be interested in
updating it?  

Respectfully,
John Crout



On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:36:02 -0700
Brett Ussher <breus...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> The project at this point is only relevant to those doing research.
> No one is working on the code base nor have they in almost 3 years.
> At least, I've seen no additions to the public repository in that
> time.
> 
> Brett D. Ussher
> 
> "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
> matter and those who matter don't mind."
> - Dr. Seuss
> 
> 
> On 01/25/2012 11:00 AM, honeywall-requ...@public.honeynet.org wrote:
> > Send Honeywall mailing list submissions to
> >     honeywall@public.honeynet.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >     https://public.honeynet.org/mailman/listinfo/honeywall
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >     honeywall-requ...@public.honeynet.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >     honeywall-ow...@public.honeynet.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Honeywall digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >     1. ver 2.0? (Gary Driggs)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:48:26 -0800
> > From: Gary Driggs<gdri...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [Honeywall] ver 2.0?
> > To: "honeywall@public.honeynet.org"<honeywall@public.honeynet.org>
> > Message-ID:<-7898449010831549898@unknownmsgid>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > It's been almost 3 years since roo 1.4 was released. I've given much
> > thought to attempting to roll my own Honeywell using another OS but
> > sticking to the same functional architecture and components.
> > However, I wouldn't want to duplicate efforts if an overhaul is
> > already underway.
> >
> > -Gary
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Honeywall mailing list
> > Honeywall@public.honeynet.org
> > https://public.honeynet.org/mailman/listinfo/honeywall
> >
> >
> > End of Honeywall Digest, Vol 54, Issue 1
> > ****************************************
> >
> >


-- 
_______________________________________________
Honeywall mailing list
Honeywall@public.honeynet.org
https://public.honeynet.org/mailman/listinfo/honeywall

Reply via email to