I've created my own using Ubuntu 11.10, borrowing some ideas from the long-dormant roo, but ignoring the stuff that I didn't use (the web interface, etc.). Whenever the netfilter update (v1.5?) makes it into a current distro that allows NAT in IPv6, then it will truly be workable for me (right now I have to run it as a router rather than a bridge in order to transparently redirect outbound SPAM to my sinkhole). At that point, if there is interest I'd be willing to share what I've done.
-- Jim Clausing GIAC GSE #26, GREM-Gold, CISSP GPG fingerprint = 4780 13A4 F33E BF4E AE86 0D64 0EFD B3E3 03BF 407A On or about Fri, 27 Jan 2012, jcr...@softhome.net pontificated thusly: > I share the sentiment expressed by Gary Driggs but am restricted by > time. I've has the impression the the project's relevance is limited > (to researchers) *because* it hasn't been updated. > > Is there an opportunity here, for those who may be interested in > updating it? > > Respectfully, > John Crout > > > > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:36:02 -0700 > Brett Ussher <breus...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> The project at this point is only relevant to those doing research. >> No one is working on the code base nor have they in almost 3 years. >> At least, I've seen no additions to the public repository in that >> time. >> >> Brett D. Ussher >> >> "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't >> matter and those who matter don't mind." >> - Dr. Seuss >> >> >> On 01/25/2012 11:00 AM, honeywall-requ...@public.honeynet.org wrote: >>> Send Honeywall mailing list submissions to >>> honeywall@public.honeynet.org >>> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>> https://public.honeynet.org/mailman/listinfo/honeywall >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>> honeywall-requ...@public.honeynet.org >>> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>> honeywall-ow...@public.honeynet.org >>> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>> than "Re: Contents of Honeywall digest..." >>> >>> >>> Today's Topics: >>> >>> 1. ver 2.0? (Gary Driggs) >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Message: 1 >>> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:48:26 -0800 >>> From: Gary Driggs<gdri...@gmail.com> >>> Subject: [Honeywall] ver 2.0? >>> To: "honeywall@public.honeynet.org"<honeywall@public.honeynet.org> >>> Message-ID:<-7898449010831549898@unknownmsgid> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> >>> It's been almost 3 years since roo 1.4 was released. I've given much >>> thought to attempting to roll my own Honeywell using another OS but >>> sticking to the same functional architecture and components. >>> However, I wouldn't want to duplicate efforts if an overhaul is >>> already underway. >>> >>> -Gary >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Honeywall mailing list >>> Honeywall@public.honeynet.org >>> https://public.honeynet.org/mailman/listinfo/honeywall >>> >>> >>> End of Honeywall Digest, Vol 54, Issue 1 >>> **************************************** >>> >>> > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Honeywall mailing list > Honeywall@public.honeynet.org > https://public.honeynet.org/mailman/listinfo/honeywall > > _______________________________________________ Honeywall mailing list Honeywall@public.honeynet.org https://public.honeynet.org/mailman/listinfo/honeywall
