I've always found it interesting that such an exposed and fairly "soloistic"
part is hardly ever encountered on 2nd Horn audition lists.

Stephen Laifer

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:00 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Send Horn mailing list submissions to
>        [email protected]
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:24:33 -0400
> From: Punto <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Hornlist] Beethoven Missa solemnis Sanctus 2nd horn part
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Does anyone know of any writings on Beethoven's choice to give the
> second horn the lead part in this movement while the first lays out for
> about 74 bars? It is not in any way similar to the 4th horn writing in
> the 9th symphony or 2nd horn solos in Fidelio or elsewhere since it
> clings to the high horn tessitura from beginning to end. In no way does
> it appear to be a late classical/pre-romantic second horn part. If it
> weren't Beethoven, I might just think that it was an attempt to give the
> principal player a rest, but he never showed any evidence of doing that
> anywhere in his writing for any instrument (or voice, for that matter).
> One other interesting touch in the second part; several exposed written
> F-sharps (horn in E), below the staff, in the Agnus  Dei.
>
> A very intense piece of music and he clearly was trying out a lot of
> adventurous ideas in it. I hope that someone can point me to some
> authoritative study on its orchestration. I just played (and quite
> enjoyed) second on a rough and tumble performance of this with meager
> forces and an even sparser audience and it would be nice to benefit from
> the common knowledge out there on this if there be any.
>
> Peter Hirsch
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at 
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to