Hans writes: <So the critizised typo was even worse:
revalent or relavent or renteval instead of correct "relevant" - more variations ????> Yes: relephant, which would be defined as a pertinent pachyderm. Sorry for the NHR cheese, but this one was hard to let pass. Back to lurking, Vin Duval _______________________________________________ post: [email protected] unsubscribe or set options at https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org
