"relephant" sounds nice, but requires different letters. ####################################################### Am 07.10.2010 um 21:52 schrieb Vincent Duval:
> Hans writes: > > <So the critizised typo was even worse: > > revalent or relavent or renteval instead of correct "relevant" - more > variations ????> > > > Yes: relephant, which would be defined as a pertinent pachyderm. > > Sorry for the NHR cheese, but this one was hard to let pass. Back to > lurking, > > Vin Duval > > > > > _______________________________________________ > post: [email protected] > unsubscribe or set options at > https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/hpizka%40me.com _______________________________________________ post: [email protected] unsubscribe or set options at https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org
