Agreed, as it is the tasks are rather large. Also, I have trouble making out smaller buildings at the imagery resolution. When in doubt, I will add a building outline.
Martijn On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Mikel Maron <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds like we should add another zoom level to the task. What this would > require is deleting the current tasks, and adding new ones. If there are no > strong objections to this, will do this over the course of the day. > > * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Michael Krämer <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:35 AM > *Subject:* Re: [HOT] Northern Uganda Tracing Exercise / Sprint > > Just as I have been about to give some feedback, the two mails from Sam > and Tim cam in. So I'm not the only one going through this. > > But first of all a huge thanks for the tracing guide. This is something I > really appreciate as it helps a lot to come to some consistent tagging. > > On the other hand I also found the tasks rather large. I had one assigned > by tasking manager which first looked like an easiy one: Mostly open > spaces, only a few paths and some buildings. But after looking more closely > I noticed that there were many huts, which take quite some time to trace. > > After I while I started using the following method in JOSM to trace the > huts: > - select a finished hut and copy the tags with ctrl-c > - press a and draw a line across the hut > - press shift-o to create the circle > - press ctrl-shift-v to past tags > Although this is rather fast, it still feels somewhat arduous looking at > the number of huts. Doing buildings with the building_tools plugin is much > faster. Unfortunatley I'm not familiar with Java, otherwise I would > probably rather try to create a corresponding plugin myself. > > So I also decided to unlock my task again. Afterwards I noticed that the > changset contained 169 ways - most of the new. I didn't even start to trace > the landuse save even trees. So I also think the squares might be too > large, I guess a quarter of the current size would give more manageable > squares. > > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > > > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > -- martijn van exel http://oegeo.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
