HOT In Person Board Meeting - Day 2 summary

We spent our second day in productive meetings and break-up groups facilitated 
by Allen Gunn. 

Agenda

1 Calendar timeline
2 Defining "HOT" projects
3 Steps to improve the bylaws
4 Growth strategy
5 Conflict resolution
6 Missing Maps
7 Communication tools

We began by laying out a timeline for the coming year, with events classified 
as organisational (key administrative dates for the organisation), program 
(mapping projects etc), external (conference dates etc), and individual (board 
availability / commitments). 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pOXXB8O3wX5QWGil8mOLwtl3QC18ar8Rvb4qjw-JORI/edit?usp=sharing

This list is still "in progress". The dates are not finalised, and also it is a 
list of more solid known-about and agreed items. We'd welcome your feedback and 
suggestions, however we will be adding to it tomorrow.

We then tackled priority discussion areas highlighted by our brainstorming 
activity yesterday. This was in smaller break-out groups.

The definition of "HOT" projects was discussed. What is a HOT project and what 
is not? We discussed ideas around having a set of requirements or guidelines 
for HOT projects, and the distinction between funded and legally contracted 
projects versus community run projects.

A plan to improve the HOT bylaws was also discussed and drafted, to resolve 
difficulties in running official meetings, particularly the current need to 
achieve a quorum of 2/3 of the membership in order for a voting members meeting 
to conduct any business, which is preventing progress with various things.

We brainstormed ideas for growing the OpenStreetMap community internationally 
and fostering new local groups/organisations. This surfaced various ideas 
around communication, mentorship and tools.

Various types of conflict in our community and strategies to work towards 
resolution was also discussed, as well as some concrete action items.

Also on the table was the Missing Maps project, which is a new initiative being 
designed by HOT along with MSF UK and American Red Cross/British Red Cross, to 
facilitate mapping of the most vulnerable places in the world. We discussed 
contents of an MOU document being drafted with the Missing Maps partners.

Finally, we listed all of the various communication channels and documentation 
tools used by the HOT community, and identified questions, issues, and areas 
which require consolidation.

https://docs.google.com/a/hotosm.org/spreadsheets/d/1jynxAcaT7lyast1FzvlHuBNkSl0XjOAsbi3xfA9MKdA/edit#gid=0

With this note we would love to hear back from you with input / feedback.


_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Reply via email to