Yes, this is EXACTLY what we need more of. For every feature type being requested for major activations, there should be THIS type of specific guidance. Thanks Chad. I've added it to my page: http://stanfordgeospatialcenter.github.io/Map4Nepal_Resources/
In F,L&T, Stace Maples Geospatial Manager Stanford Geospatial Center @mapninja staceymaples@G+ Skype: stacey.maples 214.641.0920 Find GeoData: https://earthworks.stanford.edu Get GeoHelp: https://gis.stanford.edu/ "I have a map of the United States... actual size. It says, "Scale: 1 mile = 1 mile." I spent last summer folding it." -Steven Wright- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chad Blevins" <[email protected]> To: "Stace Maples" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:54:45 AM Subject: Re: [HOT] AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRGH! Hi Stacy, The lack of guidance does lead to poor quality data. Do you have any feedback on this guide for identifying IDPs in Kathmandu ? I tried to keep is short enough so people would read it and informative enough so everyone knows why they are doing this. Thank you, Chad On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Stacey Maples < [email protected] > wrote: Joining this megathread with some feedback from trainings I'm running: 1. Peole area eager to do things "the right way" the problem is that once you've completed the Mapgive style training and selected a specific job to work on, there is VERY LITTLE TO NO GUIDANCE on what is the "right way" to digitize buildings, Residential areas, roads and paths for specific tasks. 2. Project Descriptions and Instructions should include the stakeholder's end use (what are the building footprints to be used for? Why is delineating residential areas important?, etc...), so people understand what the use of what they are creating is. I'm not even sure what the data is being used for as I am doing training, so my stock answer is "buildings are not for cadastral purposes, they don't need to be perfect. They are for counts, for population estimates and for prioritization and assessment." It would be helpful if someone with more knowledge of the end use could provide real insight into HOW the data is actually being operationalized. That kind of feedback can drive better data creation. 3. Images of region and job specific examples of buildings, resid areas and roads/paths need to be part of the Description/Instructions. An excellent example of how effective this can be is this recent job: http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1010 4. If you have a complaint about how something is being done, Don't spend 10 minutes creating a rant email. Spend 30 creating a tutorial for how to do it right. People want to help, they want to know how to help, they want to know how to help in the best way possible. Help them help. I'm doing a training in 20 minutes (did one last night for 20+ Nepali students here at Stanford). When I'm done, I will work on screenshots and writing up examples of good work on Nepal Roads, Buildings and residential areas. If someone can send me links to examples in OSM, or provide clarification on stakeholder needs and uses of these layers to help guide me in that tutorial, that would be great. In F,L&T, Stace Maples Geospatial Manager Stanford Geospatial Center @mapninja staceymaples@G+ Skype: stacey.maples 214.641.0920 Find GeoData: https://earthworks.stanford.edu Get GeoHelp: https://gis.stanford.edu/ "I have a map of the United States... actual size. It says, "Scale: 1 mile = 1 mile." I spent last summer folding it." -Steven Wright- From: "Pierre Béland" < [email protected] > To: "Andrew Buck" < [email protected] >, [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 6:57:10 AM Subject: Re: [HOT] AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRGH! I would add to this, This is the ransom of the success we had with the OpenStreetMap responses over the last few years - Haiti 2010 1.5 million edits - Haiyan 2013 4.5 million edits - Ebola million edits 16 milllions up to now? - Nepal 2015, 1.5 million edits in three days (my last count yesterday night) These HOT activations are quite a labotary, both very frustrating and motivating. We grow rapidly, interconnect with more organizations and constantly have to revise our workflows, adapt to new contexts. At the same time, this is what's make our force. What's can help the most in such HOT activations is some groups of experimented OSM contributors that take tasks like validation or routing. At the same time, the coordination is very important. Workflows and progress should be discussed. Amazing also all the products that came out in the last few days proposed by various developpers. Too busy to list them now. Please add these in the wiki. Cheer Pierre De : Andrew Buck < [email protected] > À : [email protected] Envoyé le : Mardi 28 avril 2015 8h18 Objet : Re: [HOT] AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRGH! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I do agree with you in principle, and actually suggested using the information on the task manager linke number of tiles a user has completed to do things like flag new users tiles for extra caution in validating and such. Whether we want to restrict validating by them as well is another possibility. We need to be very careful though to not discourage them because new users are the people that become experienced users a short time later and we need all the volunteers we can get. Also, I do think we tend to focus too much on the task manager, especially during activations; that is why I mentioned the josm thing. It is an excellent tool, and we should definitely continue using it, but we should also look at other ways more experienced mappers can help out. Downloading large areas by an experienced mapper and 'spot checking' them it a very good, and efficient, way of doing QA for those that know how. We need to be thinking of these other, non task manager, workflows for more experienced mappers that don't interfere with the workers on the task managers, but also allow for more efficient work by those who can handle the tools. - -AndrewBuck _______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot _______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot -- Chad Blevins GeoCenter U.S. Global Development Lab USAID 202-712-0464
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
