Hi all,
I want to thank everyone for their wonderful input! Your responses gave
me more insight on the Tasking Manager itself, especially from different
perspectives. Whether you replied to the HOT list or sent an email to me
personally, your input will all be taken into account.
Thanks again,
Rekth
On 2015-05-29 02:59, James Conkling wrote:
Brian/Rekth, one thing I've heard mentioned by new users of iD is
managing the transition from iD back to the TM. In particular,
guidance on how to close a task, when to leave it open if incomplete,
unlocking tasks, leaving comments. When looking over new editors
shoulders, this transition from iD was something that caught them up a
bunch.
Don't know how much of this would be actionable - don't imagine iD can
have TM specific buttons, and can't see how the TM could recognize
when a user returns after editing in iD. The proposed expansion of the
TM API might help resolve some of these issues in the future, though.
Just some thoughts that have been on my mind recently.
On May 28, 2015 10:44 PM, "john whelan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> One current issue is ambiguity, the word done can mean either this
tile is completed or to some it may mean I'm done for the day
/session.
>
>
> Cheerio John
>
> On 28 May 2015 at 08:57, Rekth K <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thank you for all your welcoming messages!
>>
>> I'd like to ask a question on what type(s) of user(s) to take into
consideration when testing for usability and suggesting improvements.
In other words, for what level of experience am I supposed to optimise
the Tasking Manager? Should it be for first time visitors, those who
land on the hotosm page and do not know what HOT is? Or should the
usability testing lean towards fully experienced users and their
needs?
>>
>> Rekth
>
Links:
------
[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
