Thank you Chris Gertrude On Mar 1, 2016 12:33 AM, "Chris Fleming" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Blake has mostly covered it. But worth saying explicitly, if we assume > that the best you're going to get on a GPS is 5m, but your concern is that > you're mapping things that are much closer together - then the solution is > to combine the GPS and paper based approach. The important thing from a > navigation point of view is getting the relevant features correctly placed > reactive to each other. > > What you will find is that the combination of airial/gps and survey data > will bring the accuracy down. But ultimately, relative postition is the key. > > Cheers > Chris > > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 at 17:43 Gertrude Hope <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Blake, >> Thank you so much for The information. >> On Feb 29, 2016 7:31 PM, "Blake Girardot" <[email protected]> wrote: >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
