On personal level I feel mapping buildings as nodes is very wrong so I avoid it.
But I think tagging nodes as building should be looked at very well. I will recommend it is deprecated. Best, - Enock 2017-05-20 11:38 GMT+00:00 Vao Matua <vaoma...@gmail.com>: > My opinion is that buildings should be mapped as areas. > In un-mapped areas it would be best to create landuse=residential areas > first rather than quickly tagging buildings with single nodes. When it > comes time to trace buildings it is troublesome to convert single nodes to > polygons. > For existing single node areas they could be cleaned up on an as-needed > basis. > > Emmor > (Palolo) > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Bjoern Hassler <bjohas...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Dear both, dear all, >> >> If we're agreed that it's better to map buildings as areas - should we >> try to re-map node-buildings from previous campaigns as areas? Or shall we >> just leave it? >> >> Many thanks, >> Bjoern >> >> On 19 May 2017 at 17:54, Cascafico Giovanni <cascaf...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> AFAIK Osmand renders addr: housenumber also for polygons [1]. >>> >>> Anyway I agree to the general rule that rendering has to adhere to >>> mapping (and not VS). >>> >>> [1] cascafico.altervista.org/public/Screenshot_2017-05-19-18-40-41.png >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HOT mailing list >>> HOT@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> HOT@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > HOT@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
