We have to understand that this is a sandy area in semi-desertic territory.
Sometimes, we have too many infos (ie. all the paths of people going in various
directions, taking shortcuts are printed at the rainy season). We have to
interpret this info in the context of this semi-desertic area. And sometimes
the traces + images in an area with no intense car circulation and no road
infrastructure do not let us confirm from the image that there is a link
passing through the village. Since there is no obstacles and it is logic that
the two roads be connected, yes we draw the road link to connect the two roads
where this looks the more logic.
Pierre
De : mbranco2 <[email protected]>
À : Pierre Béland <[email protected]>
Cc : "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Arne Kimmig
<[email protected]>
Envoyé le : lundi 31 juillet 2017 13h22
Objet : Re: [HOT] landuse=residential and routing problems
Thank you all for your answers, and for your hints not to map too much detailed.
For my question, the key seems to be: "roads must share a node to let the
routing software calculate...".
A lot of times I find situations like this one [1]: there are no roads
connecting the highway from NW and the highway from SE, but I think routing sw
must know the two highways are connectable...
So, I'm undestanding that sometimes it could be necessary to draw "virtual"
roads around or inside a village, to connect between them several external
roads (of course, if it seems appropriate, looking at the aerial images).If so,
maybe it could be suitable to put a note (if not a specific tag), indicating
that segment as "virtual"?
Thank you again,Marco
[1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/12.0527/14.4386
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
