On Wed, July 4, 2018 3:00 pm, Philippe Verdy wrote:
> You should also not focus too much on the exact level of accuracy of
> shapes. What is important is to have relative size, correct placement, but
> minor architectural details which do not remove the possibility of
> attaching additional data and does not prevent refining it later ('wheen
> there's a new need for that and actual usage) is not so important. So when
> detailing buildings, we just want to know initially how they are
> separated, soi that we can place addresses, POIs, determine the accesses
> (if there are pathways between them). [..]From my open JOSM, a couple areas of Bamako, from both sides of the Djoliba: https://i.imgur.com/P6TcYOM.png https://i.imgur.com/jSAGGxg.png Those don't feature duplicates, intersections with highways and other gross errors that might distract you - they are just typical samples of geometry quality. From a quick glance I would say that, by your definition of acceptable quality, about half of the building=yes there are usable... But a computer won't know which half ! _______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
