Jon,

I don't have a very good benchmark, unfortunately, but I've attached the program
I used to convince myself I wasn't crazy to suspect the interned strings. It's 
a simple
program that just interns 5 million strings, then spams a bunch of object 
creations
so the GC run a lot.

Note that while running it with Java 8 will actually result in the program 
running quicker,
if you look at the GC logs produced, you'll note that minor GCs are taking 
around 7x longer
in Java 8 on average.

You'll probably want to tweak settings yourself, but if not, or as a starting 
point, there's a
run.sh script attached that can be used to run it like ./run.sh java_version 
builtin|map
(e.g. "./run.sh 6 builtin" or "./run.sh 8 map").

Please let me know if I can do anything else to help. I'd love to get to the 
bottom of why
interned strings take so long to collect, especially when none of them are 
actually being
freed, though I suspect the reason is simply that no one ever expected anyone 
to intern
millions of strings and that it's a very rare case not worth optimizing.

Thanks,
Corbin

From: hotspot-gc-use [mailto:hotspot-gc-use-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf 
Of Jon Masamitsu
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 11:37 AM
To: hotspot-gc-use@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Unexpected Java 6 vs 8 GC performance difference

Corbin,

Do you have a benchmark that will exhibit this problem?
If not, does you application just create lots of interned strings that are long
lived?

Thanks.

Jon
On 5/31/2016 3:36 PM, Hughes,Corbin wrote:
After coming across -XX:+PrintGCTaskTimeStamps, I noticed that the listed tasks 
don't add up to the listed PSYoungGen times, so I ended up adding more "printf" 
style timing outputs to the hotspot source, and ended up tracking it down. 
Turns out it's the interned strings. The way they're GC'd isn't particularly 
efficient for large numbers of strings: the call to 
StringTable::unlink_or_oops_do(&_is_alive_closure, &root_closure); was taking 
~185 ms of the ~200 ms. I wish there were a flag to disable GC of interned 
strings, but I think we'll be able to get away with using something like a 
Guava Interner instead of the built in StringTable, so mystery solved.

From: hotspot-gc-use [mailto:hotspot-gc-use-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf 
Of Hughes,Corbin
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 9:24 PM
To: hotspot-gc-use@openjdk.java.net<mailto:hotspot-gc-use@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re: Unexpected Java 6 vs 8 GC performance difference

Jon,

Thanks for the interest. Hopefully this log will be more helpful. This is Java 
7 with the -XX:-UseParallelOldGC flag. Perhaps notably, the PSYoungGen 
collections are even slower in Java 7 (regardless of whether or not the serial 
old collector is used).

Thanks,

Corbin

{Heap before GC invocations=456 (full 0):
PSYoungGen      total 2091008K, used 2087456K [0x0000000780000000, 
0x0000000800000000, 0x0000000800000000)
  eden space 2084864K, 100% used 
[0x0000000780000000,0x00000007ff400000,0x00000007ff400000)
  from space 6144K, 42% used 
[0x00000007ff400000,0x00000007ff688000,0x00000007ffa00000)
  to   space 6144K, 0% used 
[0x00000007ffa00000,0x00000007ffa00000,0x0000000800000000)
PSOldGen        total 3145728K, used 2267941K [0x00000006c0000000, 
0x0000000780000000, 0x0000000780000000)
  object space 3145728K, 72% used 
[0x00000006c0000000,0x000000074a6c9508,0x0000000780000000)
PSPermGen       total 819200K, used 57100K [0x0000000680000000, 
0x00000006b2000000, 0x00000006c0000000)
  object space 819200K, 6% used 
[0x0000000680000000,0x00000006837c3130,0x00000006b2000000)
1461.284: [GC
Desired survivor size 6291456 bytes, new threshold 1 (max 15)
[PSYoungGen: 2087456K->1482K(2091008K)] 4355397K->2269463K(5236736K), 0.2986350 
secs] [Times: user=0.34 sys=0.00, real=0.30 secs]
Heap after GC invocations=456 (full 0):
PSYoungGen      total 2091008K, used 1482K [0x0000000780000000, 
0x0000000800000000, 0x0000000800000000)
  eden space 2084864K, 0% used 
[0x0000000780000000,0x0000000780000000,0x00000007ff400000)
  from space 6144K, 24% used 
[0x00000007ffa00000,0x00000007ffb72928,0x0000000800000000)
  to   space 6144K, 0% used 
[0x00000007ff400000,0x00000007ff400000,0x00000007ffa00000)
PSOldGen        total 3145728K, used 2267981K [0x00000006c0000000, 
0x0000000780000000, 0x0000000780000000)
  object space 3145728K, 72% used 
[0x00000006c0000000,0x000000074a6d3528,0x0000000780000000)
PSPermGen       total 819200K, used 57100K [0x0000000680000000, 
0x00000006b2000000, 0x00000006c0000000)
  object space 819200K, 6% used 
[0x0000000680000000,0x00000006837c3130,0x00000006b2000000)
}
{Heap before GC invocations=457 (full 0):
PSYoungGen      total 2091008K, used 2086346K [0x0000000780000000, 
0x0000000800000000, 0x0000000800000000)
  eden space 2084864K, 100% used 
[0x0000000780000000,0x00000007ff400000,0x00000007ff400000)
  from space 6144K, 24% used 
[0x00000007ffa00000,0x00000007ffb72928,0x0000000800000000)
  to   space 6144K, 0% used 
[0x00000007ff400000,0x00000007ff400000,0x00000007ffa00000)
PSOldGen        total 3145728K, used 2267981K [0x00000006c0000000, 
0x0000000780000000, 0x0000000780000000)
  object space 3145728K, 72% used 
[0x00000006c0000000,0x000000074a6d3528,0x0000000780000000)
PSPermGen       total 819200K, used 57100K [0x0000000680000000, 
0x00000006b2000000, 0x00000006c0000000)
  object space 819200K, 6% used 
[0x0000000680000000,0x00000006837c3130,0x00000006b2000000)
1463.560: [GC
Desired survivor size 6291456 bytes, new threshold 1 (max 15)
[PSYoungGen: 2086346K->3177K(2091008K)] 4354327K->2271183K(5236736K), 0.2974600 
secs] [Times: user=0.33 sys=0.00, real=0.30 secs]
Heap after GC invocations=457 (full 0):
PSYoungGen      total 2091008K, used 3177K [0x0000000780000000, 
0x0000000800000000, 0x0000000800000000)
  eden space 2084864K, 0% used 
[0x0000000780000000,0x0000000780000000,0x00000007ff400000)
  from space 6144K, 51% used 
[0x00000007ff400000,0x00000007ff71a730,0x00000007ffa00000)
  to   space 6144K, 0% used 
[0x00000007ffa00000,0x00000007ffa00000,0x0000000800000000)
PSOldGen        total 3145728K, used 2268005K [0x00000006c0000000, 
0x0000000780000000, 0x0000000780000000)
  object space 3145728K, 72% used 
[0x00000006c0000000,0x000000074a6d9528,0x0000000780000000)
PSPermGen       total 819200K, used 57100K [0x0000000680000000, 
0x00000006b2000000, 0x00000006c0000000)
  object space 819200K, 6% used 
[0x0000000680000000,0x00000006837c3130,0x00000006b2000000)
}
{Heap before GC invocations=458 (full 0):
PSYoungGen      total 2091008K, used 2088041K [0x0000000780000000, 
0x0000000800000000, 0x0000000800000000)
  eden space 2084864K, 100% used 
[0x0000000780000000,0x00000007ff400000,0x00000007ff400000)
  from space 6144K, 51% used 
[0x00000007ff400000,0x00000007ff71a730,0x00000007ffa00000)
  to   space 6144K, 0% used 
[0x00000007ffa00000,0x00000007ffa00000,0x0000000800000000)
PSOldGen        total 3145728K, used 2268005K [0x00000006c0000000, 
0x0000000780000000, 0x0000000780000000)
  object space 3145728K, 72% used 
[0x00000006c0000000,0x000000074a6d9528,0x0000000780000000)
PSPermGen       total 819200K, used 57100K [0x0000000680000000, 
0x00000006b2000000, 0x00000006c0000000)
  object space 819200K, 6% used 
[0x0000000680000000,0x00000006837c31b0,0x00000006b2000000)
1465.998: [GC
Desired survivor size 6291456 bytes, new threshold 1 (max 15)
[PSYoungGen: 2088041K->1456K(2091008K)] 4356047K->2269485K(5236736K), 0.2940590 
secs] [Times: user=0.33 sys=0.00, real=0.29 secs]
Heap after GC invocations=458 (full 0):
PSYoungGen      total 2091008K, used 1456K [0x0000000780000000, 
0x0000000800000000, 0x0000000800000000)
  eden space 2084864K, 0% used 
[0x0000000780000000,0x0000000780000000,0x00000007ff400000)
  from space 6144K, 23% used 
[0x00000007ffa00000,0x00000007ffb6c188,0x0000000800000000)
  to   space 6144K, 0% used 
[0x00000007ff400000,0x00000007ff400000,0x00000007ffa00000)
PSOldGen        total 3145728K, used 2268029K [0x00000006c0000000, 
0x0000000780000000, 0x0000000780000000)
  object space 3145728K, 72% used 
[0x00000006c0000000,0x000000074a6df528,0x0000000780000000)
PSPermGen       total 819200K, used 57100K [0x0000000680000000, 
0x00000006b2000000, 0x00000006c0000000)
  object space 819200K, 6% used 
[0x0000000680000000,0x00000006837c31b0,0x00000006b2000000)
}


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from 
Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information 
contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or 
non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. 
Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such 
information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the 
addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the 
delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas 
City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024.




_______________________________________________

hotspot-gc-use mailing list

hotspot-gc-use@openjdk.java.net<mailto:hotspot-gc-use@openjdk.java.net>

http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/hotspot-gc-use<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mail.openjdk.java.net_mailman_listinfo_hotspot-2Dgc-2Duse&d=CwMF-g&c=NRtzTzKNaCCmhN_9N2YJR-XrNU1huIgYP99yDsEzaJo&r=boyF4rmil1TfZ0CMFcwpJ5XChHGvDUZdECQt6wqy-r0&m=B6u7i_01oloEDuUMBMJsz1kisWSAdfbraatfZ8rVGDs&s=PhJEuNeIJsg-CJfmrUwLpxmlCBYo66v8VqK0denTqh8&e=>

Attachment: Garbage.java
Description: Garbage.java

Attachment: run.sh
Description: run.sh

_______________________________________________
hotspot-gc-use mailing list
hotspot-gc-use@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/hotspot-gc-use

Reply via email to