Hello everyone, In reference to joyrex's email (sorry I dont know the name), some folks have had issues with Eclipse including me. Someone recommended me to use Aptana couple of years back and I have to say, I have not had even 1 issue. Yes, thats correct not even a single problem. I have Aptana studio 1.1.7 at work and latest 2.0 I believe, at home and I love it.
So my recommendation is if you have had issues, try aptana. Its eclipse based and so there is no learning curve. In reference to comparision sheet that was posted, aptana supports ftp as well as sftp. How about that. There used to be a paid version I believe for sftp but now its free. As for CSS and JavaScript, I am sure there is code assist as well. Go get it now for free http://aptana.org/ You will not regret it. I promise. :-) <Ajas Mohammed /> http://ajashadi.blogspot.com We cannot become what we need to be, remaining what we are. No matter what, find a way. Because thats what winners do. You can't improve what you don't measure. Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives. On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Joyrex <[email protected]>wrote: > That was probably Aptana Studio with CFEclipse added to it... > CFEclipse does have code insight (from what I recall), but in earlier > builds, it was a bit unstable. The fact that Eclipse needs Java to run > also annoys me for some reason. > > I too, have tried using Eclipse-based IDEs and usually find things > that aggravate me and I migrate back to Dreamweaver CS4 (at least on > the PC... nothing can touch Coda on the Mac, IMO). > > On Mar 23, 7:56 pm, Aaron Rouse <[email protected]> wrote: > > I remember using some IDE last year that had code insight for CFM but > can't > > recall the name. Would have thought it was cfeclipse since can't think > of > > what else I'd tried but guess it was something else. > > > > I will eventually have to try this one out but not really all that > > optimistic since everytime I use an Eclipse based IDE I end up not liking > > one thing or another about the find/replace tools. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Mark Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'd be curious to see what the eventual price of CF Builder by itself > > > is. BY packaging CF Builder and Flash Builder, I think Adobe is once > again > > > trying to encourage CF developers to cross-train as Flex developers. > Using > > > Flash builder to create Flex apps is pretty easy, especially with the > two > > > builders looking so similar and using CF as back-end for Flex apps. > > > > > As to Seth's note, yes the code insight for ajax, javascript and cfml > may > > > be the coolest and most worthwhile feature. As we move forward and > more > > > people wrap their heads around ORM and just how time-saving that will > be, I > > > believe that will be an important feature as well. > > > > > Just my two cents... > > > > > Mark > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > > > Behalf Of *Seth Bienek > > > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 23, 2010 9:12 AM > > > *To:* [email protected] > > > *Subject:* RE: [houcfug] Re: ColdFusion Builder Released > > > > > Howdy, > > > > > Here's a comparison of the most commonly used IDE's for ColdFusion > > > development: > > > > > < > http://www.terrenceryan.com/blog/post.cfm/coldfusion-builder-for-drea...> > > > > > As you can see, much of the functionality in CFB and CFEclipse > overlaps, > > > and this comparison is provided by Terrence Ryan, Adobe’s ColdFusion > > > evangelist, so it may leave out some features in CFEclipse. I can say > that > > > the “Code Insight” feature alone is HUGE. This is something that other > IDEs > > > have had for quite some time that I am happy to finally see on the CF > > > platform. > > > > > Does anyone have some input on this chart? > > > > > Either way, if the market will not bear the $300 price tag for CF > Builder + > > > Flash Builder, then Adobe will certainly have to adjust the price; only > time > > > will tell what will happen in this arena. > > > > > Personally, I’ve been using the CF Builder beta for the past few > months, > > > and while it isn’t perfect, it is a very nice editor. > > > > > Seth > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf > > > Of Joyrex > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 8:56 AM > > > To: Houston ColdFusion Users' Group > > > Subject: [houcfug] Re: ColdFusion Builder Released > > > > > Adobe's charging 299USD for their implementation of a open source FREE > IDE > > > - can anyone tell me or point out the advantage Builder has over > Eclipse > > > with CFEclipse or Aptana Studio with CFEclipse? I looked at the > > > features/bullet points and honestly don't see any "must have" > > > > > features. Sorry if this comes off as a bit pessimistic/skeptical, but I > had > > > hoped for years Adobe would build a new application from the ground up, > > > tailored specifically to CF development. > > > > > On Mar 22, 1:56 pm, "Bienek,Seth" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > ColdFusion Builder, Adobe's new IDE for developing ColdFusion > > > applications, has been officially released! > > > > > > More details > > > > > > at:http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/cfbuilder/features/ > > > > > > Take Care, > > > > > > Seth > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston > > > ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list. > > > > > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > > > > > For more options, visithttp://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to houcfug+ > > > unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words > "REMOVE > > > ME" as the subject. > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston > > > ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list. > > > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > > > For more options, visithttp://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to houcfug+ > > > unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words > "REMOVE > > > ME" as the subject. > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston > > > ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list. > > > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > > > For more options, visithttp://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to houcfug+ > > > unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words > "REMOVE > > > ME" as the subject. > > > > -- > > Aaron Rousehttp://www.happyhacker.com/ > > > > image001.png > > 109KViewDownload > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston > ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list. > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to houcfug+ > unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE > ME" as the subject. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list. To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to houcfug+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
