I prefer to archive current cf admin settings for each instance. Uninstall.
Install.  Import settings checking paths before deploy. I would be surprised
if this does not work for X upgrade.  I don't think an upgrade in pla e
would have a happy outcome.
On Mar 11, 2011 4:48 PM, "Aaron Rouse" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd be curious how well an upgrade ends up working from CF9 multi-server
> installation to CF10. I am betting it will have some flukiness to it. I
> really don't think our purchasing folks look at the details down to
> something like jboss v. jrun. Now the IT folks who just want any reason at
> all to kill CF, I am sure would use that as an arguing point against it.
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Mike G <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> At least until CFX.01.... but honestly, jboss will likely be as invisible
>> as jrun has been. When is the last time MOST of us have logged into the
jrun
>> console? I think the problem most big companies will have will be in the
>> procurement office. Jboss is open source. No one to pay for support
unless
>> adobe is going to offer jboss support to cfx customers. IT procurement
>> loves to pay for maint support.
>> On Mar 11, 2011 2:19 PM, "Ajas Mohammed" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Thanks Mark for sharing this.
>> >
>> > My first thought is we have CF 9 enterprise now and I guess if we move
to
>> CF
>> > X, during installation, the installer will take over from JRUN and
>> configure
>> > Tomcat on our servers. I am certain lot of folks would say lets wait on
>> > this. :-)
>> >
>> >
>> > <Ajas Mohammed />
>> > http://ajashadi.blogspot.com
>> > We cannot become what we need to be, remaining what we are.
>> > No matter what, find a way. Because thats what winners do.
>> > You can't improve what you don't measure.
>> > Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high
intention,
>> > sincere effort, intelligent direction and skillful execution; it
>> represents
>> > the wise choice of many alternatives.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Mark Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Not sure how many here have seen this?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://www.coldfusionjedi.com/index.cfm/2011/3/3/ColdFusion-X-Writeup
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Today at Scotch on the Rocks, Adam Lehman released some tidbits about
>> the
>> >> upcoming new release of ColdFusion, ColdFusion X. I tweeted as much as
>> >> possible, but for those who don't use Twitter, and for those who want
a
>> >> general one page summary they can comment on, here is what he said and
>> my
>> >> opinion where applicable. Please note that anything announced today
>> could
>> >> easily change between now and the real release. Also remember these
>> notes
>> >> are based on my memory of what Adam said. Any mistakes are my fault.
>> >>
>> >> 1) Verity will be removed.
>> >>
>> >> Not much to say about this. Adam suggested anyone using Verity now
>> should
>> >> begin looking into transitioning to Solr. Even if Verity wasn't being
>> >> removed I think most people would recommend this anyway. Verity *was*
a
>> >> good product. I don't think it got the credit it deserved. But it's
>> ancient
>> >> now and Solr is much more capable.
>> >>
>> >> 2) JRun is being removed in favor of Tomcat.
>> >>
>> >> Not much to say about this one. I've used Tomcat before and it seems
ok
>> -
>> >> but I've had issues with it and Apache. Hopefully that won't be a
>> problem.
>> >> Adam said - multiple times - that Adobe would be supporting Tomcat so
>> that
>> >> if you had issues with ColdFusion and Tomcat you won't be left out in
>> the
>> >> cold. I'm guessing this will be a slightly painful transition the
>> *first*time and then after that - not much of a big deal. Unofficial
reports
>> are
>> >> that ColdFusion runs much faster over Tomcat so any 'free' speed boost
>> is a
>> >> good thing.
>> >>
>> >> 3) Webservices updated to Axis 2.
>> >>
>> >> Anyone who does much with web services in ColdFusion will know that
it's
>> >> use of Axis 1 leads to issues with many service providers. ColdFusion
X
>> will
>> >> upgrade Axis to 2.latest while keeping support for Axis 1 as well. It
>> was
>> >> suggested that in ColdFusion 11 Axis 1 would go away completely. This
>> update
>> >> will help enable Exchange 2010 support.
>> >>
>> >> 4) Scheduled tasks updated.
>> >>
>> >> Scheduled tasks will support chaining (run task B when A is done),
>> >> conditions (don't run if CPU is 80% busy), priority, and grouping
>> (consider
>> >> A, B, and C a group and do this to them as a whole). Also - finally -
>> you
>> >> will be able to make them application specific.
>> >>
>> >> 5) Jobs
>> >>
>> >> Basically you wrap a set of code in a cfjob tag and it runs
>> asynchronously.
>> >> It gets added to a queue you can introspect and modify. Basically a
>> >> shorthand for cfthread but with more control over the queue stack.
>> >>
>> >> 6) Java loader/proxies.
>> >>
>> >> No more need for JavaLoader - you can now load jars/classes via a This
>> >> scope attribute in the Application scope. On the Java side, your Java
>> code
>> >> can create an interface from a CFC. Both seem like really nice, useful
>> >> updates.
>> >>
>> >> 7) Closures.
>> >>
>> >> Ok, I'm on the fence on this one. I load closures in JavaScript. I
>> honestly
>> >> don't know how much I'd use them in a server side language. I'm sure
>> I'll
>> >> regret saying that though and I bet I'll wonder how I ever lived
without
>> >> them. Then again, it could end up being the next cfinterface. It was
>> hinted
>> >> that the implementation could be similar to what Mark blogged<
>> http://blog.mxunit.org/2010/01/what-would-your-cfml-look-like-with.html
>about
>> a few months ago.
>>
>> >>
>> >> 8) HTML5/jquery
>> >>
>> >> Nothing concrete was said here, but it was stressed that HTML5 and
>> jQuery
>> >> would be supported in big ways.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston
>> >> ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list.
>> >> To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
>> >> For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston
>> ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list.
>> > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
>> > For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston
>> ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list.
>> To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
>> For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Aaron Rouse
> http://www.happyhacker.com/
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston
ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list.
> To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
> For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston ColdFusion 
Users' Group" discussion list.
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en

Reply via email to