On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:30:57 -0500 "Russell L. Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I looked at blogging packages a couple of years ago. Back then, > WordPress appealed to me. But over the past year or so, WordPress > has been issuing a new release every few months, and upgrading to a > new release can take an hour or more. Such devotion may be merited > by a religion, but not by a blogging tool. > > Somehow I overlooked Moveable Type, together with the fact that MT is > written in Perl. > > My blog has static content -- an article is added once or twice a > week, and there is no provision for comments or user interaction. A > visitor should be able to see an index of article titles, and he > should be able to print out individual articles. > > While I am searching with Google to seet the pros and cons of > switching from WP to MT, I thought it might be well to inquire as to > how MT rates among members of the Perl community. I don't know about everyone else. I've been using MT for quite a while. My biggest problem is that it works well enough that I forget to upgrade. G. Wade -- When in doubt, use brute force -- Ken Thompson _______________________________________________ Houston mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/houston Website: http://houston.pm.org/
