Ditto on the upgrading. I've considered moving to a hosted solution for this reason. Have a look at Motion, http://movabletype.com/motion/ their newest (and more *social*) offering.
Dig into the code, it's a great code base. While on the subject, I found this interesting too: http://shaderlab.com/six-apart-core-javascript/ -Will On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:55 PM, G. Wade Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:30:57 -0500 > "Russell L. Harris" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I looked at blogging packages a couple of years ago. Back then, > > WordPress appealed to me. But over the past year or so, WordPress > > has been issuing a new release every few months, and upgrading to a > > new release can take an hour or more. Such devotion may be merited > > by a religion, but not by a blogging tool. > > > > Somehow I overlooked Moveable Type, together with the fact that MT is > > written in Perl. > > > > My blog has static content -- an article is added once or twice a > > week, and there is no provision for comments or user interaction. A > > visitor should be able to see an index of article titles, and he > > should be able to print out individual articles. > > > > While I am searching with Google to seet the pros and cons of > > switching from WP to MT, I thought it might be well to inquire as to > > how MT rates among members of the Perl community. > > I don't know about everyone else. I've been using MT for quite a while. > My biggest problem is that it works well enough that I forget to > upgrade. > > G. Wade > -- > When in doubt, use brute force -- Ken Thompson > _______________________________________________ > Houston mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/houston > Website: http://houston.pm.org/ >
_______________________________________________ Houston mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/houston Website: http://houston.pm.org/
