I have been observing this forum for several months. It is quite 
apparent to me that most of you are vastly worthy – taking the extra 
steps to go beyond `mere machines and promises'. We are `of kind' – 
and not of those who complain of technological faults, rather those 
who capitalize on faults, features or whatever.

The real concept point from DAY ONE in any rookie birth – is to 
assume that "[any] process, [any] chemistry and [any] tools" don't 
work…and that it is the individuals that will MAKE them work. It is 
our techniques and ideas that move stagnant technology forward. If 
you need to rely on the success of Steve Jobs – stay with the Mac's 
and the Epson's. I'm more used to PC'ers who KNOW the technology 
ISN'T working – and devise ways to MAKE it work…and sell it.

Give EVERYBODY and ANYBODY an HP printer…and ONLY a FEW will take it 
further. THIS is a paradigm that HP should want to encourage – a 
select group of individuals that want to push technology – like 
placing the single cell of `capability' into a Petri dish and 
watching to see what grows, when, where and why. Not entirely unlike 
like the arguments of Open Source programming. 

Having been in the graphics industry for 3 decades – I know the 
dynamic that separates time-clock punchers from those smell invention…
and it is a wide berth. I began in a technology that did NOT work BUT 
we had to MAKE it WORK to the satisfaction of our bosses AND our 
clients – folks without a shred of grace in those years. 

To this day, three decades later, we are still producing that product 
and every day it is still the same `wild stallion' that you have to 
tame with talent, technique and patience. 

>From what I have read, I think the majority of you will do well. The 
fact that you are in the forums reveals that you search. The `act' of 
searching reveals your humility in understanding that you lack 
knowledge. The first step to wisdom, is the knowledge that you lack 
it. 

So far, the best technique advice I've seen is regarding "rear feed" –
 you have to be BOLD. 

The key to advancing beyond HP constraints is having coatings you can 
apply that will accept the new Vivera ink sets. If HP was wise – they 
would release coatings to their customer base rather than dabble in 
short supplying pre-coated substrates. 

HP needs a free customer base – and I will tell you this, once you 
have a coating to accept and cure HP inks – on ANY substrate, the 
market is yours. 

While I have access to such coatings – they are not of the quality HP 
could provide.  

If HP wants success – they should bow to their clients.




Website: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPDesignJet_Printers
Post message: [email protected] 
Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
List owner:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPDesignJet_Printers/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPDesignJet_Printers/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to