Justin,

Hey Justin.
There are some very sophisticated members here, from whom you will get some 
advanced 
answers.  I'll take a simple bent and share an experience I had recently which 
shows how 
easy it was for me to miss a basic step and end up with output that was off the 
mark, 
despite the best intentions and attention to detail.

Like yourself I was getting prints that were not bad, just not right.  I was 
using a Z3100, 
was calibrating / profiling and getting lovely strips of color patches along 
the way.  Sure I 
was doing everything right, and considering all the usual steps (application 
managed 
colors, right paper profile, etc.) I finally contacted HP for their assistance. 
 I know from 
experience that sometimes an observer can objectively see something you just 
don't 
notice or think of, no matter how experienced you consider yourself.

At any rate after he and I established that I was executing the correct 
workflow choices in 
the dialog boxes, but still not getting the desired output, he asked the 
fateful question, 
"Are you sure you're picking the custom profile you created?  You are given the 
option to 
rename the profile during the process before saving it..."  Suddenly a bulb 
went on.  I had 
renamed the profile, leaving off only the "HP" at the beginning to see that it 
was not the 
OEM profile for the paper.  BUT, the effect of the name change was the culprit. 
 The 
custom profile name began "Z3100...".  SInce profile names are listed in the 
profile list 
alphabetically, and the list can be very long, I hadn't thought through that 
the "Z" in the 
name was going to force my profile all the way to the end of the list, instead 
of grouping it 
with the other HP media choices.  When I scrolled down past dozens of unrelated 
manufacturer profiles (way past the HP listings), there at the very end of the 
list was the 
actual profile I had created.  Needless to say, choosing the "real" custom 
profile made the 
difference and output cleaned up considerably.

I've also seen a significant difference in output over the course of just a few 
weeks as the 
seasonal temperature changed in my area.  The environmental influence (temp, 
humidity, 
etc) made a visible color shift that cleaned up with a new calibration / 
profile.

In summary, solving the paper profile issue may be more important than 
splitting hairs 
with monitor calibration.  

But the naming convention oversight was an eye opener.
Heaven help me as I navigate the cortical deterioration of the next quarter 
century!

Good luck,
Mark

IMAGEMA
Mark Alberhasky Photography
Bowling Green, KY
www.imagema.com



Website: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPDesignJet_Printers
Post message: [email protected] 
Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
List owner:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPDesignJet_Printers/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPDesignJet_Printers/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to