Gilles Detillieux on Thu 14/06 13:55 -0500:
> I think Geoff and I are also a little less eager than you seem to be
> to take on the US government. :-)
;) I just have an intense dislike for how they consistently seek to
stand in the way of progress.
> We also were, and still are, reluctant to introduce changes to the
> stable release that will make it dependent on another 3rd party
> library. Given the problems some users have been reporting with the
> ssl.4 patch, I'm not eager to make these everybody's problem by
> incorporating SSL support into the next 3.1.x release. We do have SSL
> support in the latest 3.2 beta, and for now, I think that's still the
> best place for it until it gets a good shakedown.
Agreed, that's probably the best strategy for a maintenance release.
But note that I've been using 3.1 with the SSL patch for a while now,
with utterly no problems.
_______________________________________________
htdig-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
