On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Joshua Gerth wrote:

> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Joshua Gerth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Joe R. Jah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Gilles Detillieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
     Geoff Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [htdig-dev] What patches won't make it to 3.1.6?
> 
> 
> Howdy,
> 
> So I figured I would add some unsolicited comment to this.
> 
> > > According to Geoff Hutchison:
> > > > At 3:47 AM -0700 7/14/01, Joe R. Jah wrote:
> > > > >  > ssl.4                         296            omitted
8<>8
> I upgraded the ssl.2 patch to ssl.3 and I can say that its more of a hack
> than an real patch and I would not suggest it be included in 3.1.6.  I
> also wrote the HTTPS/SSL code for 3.2 and can also say that there is no
> way I am going to backport this to 3.1.x.  As stated above, it would be a
> major undertaking.
> 
> All this said, once 3.1.6 is released I would be willing to update the
> ssl.4 patch to work with the new version ... unless someone else is really
> excited about doing this.

Great!  Thank you Joshua; My vote is an enthusiastic +1;)

Regards,

Joe
-- 
     _/   _/_/_/       _/              ____________    __o
     _/   _/   _/      _/         ______________     _-\<,_
 _/  _/   _/_/_/   _/  _/                     ......(_)/ (_)
  _/_/ oe _/   _/.  _/_/ ah        [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
htdig-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev

Reply via email to