According to Neal Richter: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Gilles Detillieux wrote: > > Speaking of committing to CVS, Neal, what's up with your request to hold off? ... > > What was the busy work other than adding bug tracker categories, which > > you mentioned in your earlier message? Are you done and is it OK to > > commit now? I noticed some people have been doing so. > > Nothing really.. the idea was at this point we should have > a 'Include_in_3.2' bug associated with each 'commit' until we release. > This is purely for the purpose of 'tracking' the bugs & fixes. > > I was wanting to get the 'Include_in_3.2' group added first... and clean > up the bug list. That's done. > > No offense intended there... I was just trying to get some measure of > organization to the 'Feature-Freeze' state we are in now. > > ie.. during 'feature-freeze' there should be a bug created for each > issue, and any commits should list the bug number in the commit message. > > This isn't an attempt to exert control.. just to help organize the > process.
No offense taken at all. I was just a bit puzzled as to the reason and the status of your request to hold off. This helps clarify things a lot. I'm all for organizing the process better, but I think what you just said needed to be stated explicitly so we all understand what the process ought to be. Thanks. -- Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/ Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ ht://Dig Developer mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
