On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 04:01, Gilles Detillieux wrote: > I got thouroughly confused in reading your patch, though, because > it is reversed, with the new code appearing in the first file and > the old code in the second, rather than the other way around.
Oops... :) > Taking that into account, though, the patch seems right to me. I > think it should be committed ASAP. Done. Could you (or someone) please confirm it and close the bug report? Thanks, Lachlan -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ht://Dig developer DownUnder (http://www.htdig.org) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ ht://Dig Developer mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
