Greetings all, I've only been following this thready loosely, but my opinions are:
1. In version 3.2.1 (or 3.3, or 4.0) there should be three possible settings: true, false, auto. That way the user has complete control, but doesn't need to exert it. 2. We are in feature freeze, and scheduled to release in one week's time, at the end of October. We should minimise changes to the code. Has a bug report been filed for this issue yet? Wasn't the plan to have no CVS commits without reference to a bug number? Cheers, Lachlan On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:30, Gabriele Bartolini wrote: > So ... we have 2 possibilities now: > > 1) leave the code as is > 2) remove the overriding of the head before get in the incremental > dig > > I must confess. I would prefer option 2, as I think users' must > have full control of the tool and IMHO by adding a default > behaviour of HEAD before GET to the system we've done our part. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ht://Dig developer DownUnder (http://www.htdig.org) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 _______________________________________________ ht://Dig Developer mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
