Gabriele wrote: > 1) leave the code as is > 2) remove the overriding of the head before get in the incremental dig > > In both cases we need to write down a better documentation for this > attribute (especially in the option 2 where we should talk about the > benefits of a HEAD call in the incremental dig). > > I must confess. I would prefer option 2, as I think users' must have full > control of the tool and IMHO by adding a default behaviour of HEAD before > GET to the system we've done our part.
OK, you've convinced me, it IS useful to have this switch be user controlled.. I wasn't aware of the non-compliant servers causing an issue. Clearly 'automatic' behavior in that case is a bad thing. Go with option 2. Thanks! Neal Richter Knowledgebase Developer RightNow Technologies, Inc. Customer Service for Every Web Site Office: 406-522-1485 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 _______________________________________________ ht://Dig Developer mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
