According to Darrell Golliher: > If it's only a matter of bigendian/littleendian do you think it would > be valid to run the binary databases through "dd swab"? to get a > working version for other architecture?
No, I'm afraid it's note quite that simple. The databases are a mix of characters, short ints, long ints, and I think a few doubles, all intermixed and some parts are compressed. A dd swab would mess it up even more than the switch to a different CPU would. As you're already using 3.1.6, it's very easy to run htdump on the machine that did the digging, copy the db.docs and db.wordlist over to the other machine, then run htload and htmerge. -- Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/~grdetil Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Phone: (204)789-3766 Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) Fax: (204)789-3930 _______________________________________________ htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a subject of unsubscribe FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
