On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Gabor Szabo wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Sam Tregar wrote: > > > Alright, this sounds fine to me. I'm commiting this now. > > Oh thanks .... > Is this suposed to be the correct CVS ? > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/html-template/HTML-Template/ > > I am asking as I have just checked it out again (which took me > 30 minutes) and it does not contain the t/ directory yet.
That's right, but I think it runs on a delayed update from the real CVS source. > I remember that and also that I was not convinced back then that no_plan > is a good thing. :) > Reading it again.... > Still not.:) Oh well. > I am using this as I had a number of cases when suddenly part of my tests > did not run and I did not get any warning about this. That's very weird. Did your code die() or seg-fault or something? If so Test::Harness should notice and produce a 'dubious' result, not an 'ok'. > So what do you say, would such thing work ? > - no_plan during the main development of a test suit > - plan after it. How about no_plan all the time? I can't stand updating magic numbers. Computers are supposed to do my counting for me! -sam ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND _______________________________________________ Html-template-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/html-template-users
