On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Philip S Tellis wrote: > global_vars are not the same as a scope resolution operator. They only > allow, well, global variables to be seen everywhere.
This is a good description of how global_vars actually worked but not how I intended it to work! I've fixed the bug that was preventing inner loops from seeing outer loop variables so now global_vars should do everything is was originally intended to do. > This is just another job for a filter. Frankly, I'd suggest replacing > global_vars=>1 with filters anyway. It really makes more sense than > cluttering up all namespaces. I don't think filter can address this problem really since the binding of an inner loop variable can change from iteration to iteration. However, I'm definitely sick and tired of my implementation of global_vars so if you have a better one please feel free to offer up a patch! -sam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
