Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
If I'm correct, this makes HttpClient users unable to be more than "conditionally compliant" with the HTTP specifications. To be fully compliant, one must (e.g. SHOULD is used in RFC) not refer anymore to a permanently moved resource (301), which is not the case with a temporarily moved resource (302), and there is no way to distinguish between these two cases using your proposed technique.
Yes, I am afraid this is true. Please feel free to add a RFE to the issue tracking system.
Ortwin Gl�ck
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
