DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38385>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38385 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-26 11:29 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) ... > > Do you mean the remove the deprecated constructors etc or the whole URI class > implementation ? I was using this constructor because I was not able to > obtain > an uri whose isOpaquePart returned true using the URI(String, boolean) > constructor, for example from <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> What I get is an > absolute > uri with relative path [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?? I am asking because I am doing > some > testing following RFC3986 and using httpclient.URI class and JDK1.4 > java.net.URI. Michele, I meant the whole class (URI). This is my personal opinion that the URI class heeds to go, and not that of the HttpClient committers. This issue will be subject to open discussion on the dev list and eventually to a formal vote. I will be pressing for deprecation (removal) of this class in favor of JDK14 URI class, unless someone will step in to maintain and seriously refactor the URI and related classes. The person who originally wrote the code left the project about two years ago. The code has been effectively unmaintained ever since. Oleg -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
