DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38385>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38385 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-26 12:13 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > (In reply to comment #2) > > ... ... > Oleg, > I am doing these tests with junit on one side and rfc 3986 in the other and I > found that java4.net.URI has also some problems. An other thing is that if > you > have a problem with java.net.URI is not possible to change the code. I would > leave at least a wrapper around so that someone can still intervene in case > of > problems. An other difference is that java.net.URI is unmodificable, while > httpclient.URI is modificable, do you think is really needed for it to be > modificable ? The code is perhaps in some parts "ugly" but I cannot say too > bad > things on it since I was using it since when I found it in package > org.apache.util that was included in Slide in 2001/2 and also thanks to it > and > even thanks to its errors I started to become interested in the concept. Its > uniqueness is in being quite forgiving in parsing > My aim is to make a java4-independent URI only package (may be some URI > comparators for different scopes [like network]). I already fit java4 URI > into > this framework and passed almost all but 3 of the (188) tests, now I am > trying > with httpclient.URI and I am around 20 failures. I must say that I found a > little bit heavy the fact of needing httpclient, codec and even logging for > using a URI class. JUnit made me crazy with the class loaded wrong hierarchy > for logging... > Last thing...does httpclient need java 1.4 ? > Ciao > Michele We may consider migrating this code to a module of its own, _provided_ someone steps in to maintain it. Otherwise, I would very much rather prefer to use something which is a part of standard JDK and is maintained (however badly) HttpClient 2.0.x and HttpClient 3.x require JDK 1.2.2 only. HttpClient 4.0 is very likely to require JDK 1.4 Oleg -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
