>In my opinion the traffic analyzer misinterprets the packets. It detected the 'content-length: 21' header and mistakenly displayed the >first 21 bytes of the next request head as the content of the previous one.
Yeah, stupid Wireshark. Once I looked at it closer, it is reassembling that packet. >For the love of God, people, do _not_ use NTLM. SSL + Basic is _infinitely_ more secure. Trust me, this is not my choice. I have to support NTLM so this gets me no closer to a solution. I can only conclude that expect continue does not work with NTLM. Thanks for your help. Tony This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Messages sent to and from Stoneware, Inc. may be monitored. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
