On 02/06/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks, > > We are currently considering whether we should continue using > commons-logging or migrate to SLF4J or java.util.logging. Please let us > what your preference is. We are going to make the final decision based > on the results of the poll. A simple majority will _not_ automatically > impose a particular choice but will strongly influence the decision > making process. > > All users of HttpClient are encouraged to participate. > > Oleg > > ------------------- > [X] keep Commons logging > [ ] migrate to SLF4J > [ ] migrate to java.util.logging > ------------------- > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
- [POLL] Logging toolkit for HttpClient 4.x Oleg Kalnichevski
- Re: [POLL] Logging toolkit for HttpClient 4.x Sebastiaan van Erk
- Re: [POLL] Logging toolkit for HttpClient 4.x Sam Berlin
- Re: [POLL] Logging toolkit for HttpClient 4.x Olivier Lamy
- Re: [POLL] Logging toolkit for HttpClient 4.x sebb
- RE: [POLL] Logging toolkit for HttpClient 4.x Pete Keyes
- RE: [POLL] Logging toolkit for HttpClient 4.x Morris, Chris
- Re: [POLL] Logging toolkit for HttpClient 4.x Tatu Saloranta
- RE: [POLL] Logging toolkit for HttpClient 4.x Moore, Greg
- Re: [POLL] Logging toolkit for HttpClient 4.x jefftymc
- Re: [POLL] Logging toolkit for HttpClient 4.x Raman Gupta
- Re: [POLL] Logging toolkit for HttpClient ... Julius Davies
- Re: [POLL] Logging toolkit for HttpClient 4.x Erik Bertelsen
- RE: [POLL] Logging toolkit for HttpClient 4.x Talbott, Thomas
