2008/6/2 Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Folks, > > We are currently considering whether we should continue using > commons-logging or migrate to SLF4J or java.util.logging. Please let us > what your preference is. We are going to make the final decision based > on the results of the poll. A simple majority will _not_ automatically > impose a particular choice but will strongly influence the decision > making process. > > All users of HttpClient are encouraged to participate. > > Oleg > > ------------------- > [ ] keep Commons logging > [ ] migrate to SLF4J > [ ] migrate to java.util.logging > ------------------- > > Keep commons-logging or use slf4j - I dont care much about that -- But please don't use java.util.logging explicitly. I think that I know how to build an application using both commons-logging-based libraries and slf4j-based libraries and still be able to configure the actual logging using log4j, but going directly to java.util.logging causes problems in my experience when we mix several 3rd party libraries into one single application.
- Erik
