Hi Oleg, >> HttpState: >> We've talked about that during the High Level Design. >> It's good enough for alpha1, but should be split into >> it's different aspects afterwards. > > I do think it is _really_ important to get ALPHA1 release out rather > sooner then later. Port of HttpClient to HttpCore is a massive change by > itself and is intended to address the most severe architectural issues > with HttpClient. HttpState is somewhat ugly but not utterly broken the > same way HttpMethod / HttpMethodBase are. Therefore I would rather have > more test cases ported from 3.1 to 4.0 API and get the new framework > reasonably tested and stable and only then get down to fixing > non-critical aspects such as the HTTP state management API.
Agreed. > What remains to be done for ALPHA1 in HttpConn? Use of HttpParams and test coverage, as far as I remember. The gaping holes I left were in HttpClient. Fixing those might of course expose omissions in the HttpConn API. cheers, Roland --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
