On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 09:34 +0200, Ortwin Glück wrote: > Hi Asanka, > > Personally I have no problem with making contrib-benchmark a real > product. It's merely I a question of resources. I'd like to hold a > public poll to get an idea of how much public interest is in this > package. At the same time I'd like to ask for volunteer maintainers. > It's probably not much work to just maintain it's API compatibility > (i.e. "it compiles"). It's more work to fix bugs and enhance features. > > Odi >
Asankha, Odi and all I believe the contrib-benchmark is too small to be viable as a full-blown project with a release cycle of its own. What do you think of making it an optional sub-module of HttpCore, though? Roland, Would you have any objections to this idea? Oleg > Asankha C. Perera wrote: > > Hi Oleg > > > > I am much interested to see the code currently in the 'contrib' > > benchmark package publicized and given its due recognition esp since > > most of the load testing tools currently out there have serious costs or > > limitations. From my point of view even AB does not cut it well as it > > fails to properly handle chunked responses and SSL (I may be wrong > > here!) I have made a few enhancements to the code to support concurrent > > user simulation and to support https, and for what I use it for (Web > > services), its almost equal to AB in performance.. so I simply love it! > > > > Do you have any plans for this code under HttpCore or do you see it > > becoming a module or sub project etc? I would like to see this being > > made available for the public to use.. and would be willing to > > contribute more to this effort. > > > > thanks > > asankha > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
