Hi Oleg, Sebastian, all, > I _personally_ find the requirement of conditional compilation of LGPL > dependent code too restrictive and complicating the release process,
I agree, in particular if that should mean we can't release binaries with NTLM support built in. But the conditional compilation is a _Jakarta_ policy, not an Apache one. Let's see where we are a year from now. sebb wrote: > Quote: > > "Therefore, LGPL v2.1-licensed works must not be included in Apache > products, although they may be listed as system requirements or > distributed elsewhere as optional works." > > Seems to me that it should not be too difficult to make JCIFS an > optional work. As I understand it, optional work would refer to hosting a separate project elsewhere and using the LGPL for that. HttpAuth-NTLM or such. But listing jCIFS as system requirement for using NTLM seems quite reasonable to me. It wouldn't be included in our product. cheers, Roland --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
