Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > In both cases one still needs to subclass abstract connection classes in > order to customize the way HTTP messages are constructed. > > I can take care of ensuring class name consistency across modules this > weekend.
OK. But I still feel it would be a good idea to factor out the message header parsing from AbstractClientConnection and, for sake of symmetry, AbstractServerConnection. It would also serve people such as Jeroen, who would then no longer need to create a fake connection in order to parse data that is already in memory. cheers, Roland --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
