On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 17:33 +0200, Roland Weber wrote: > Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > In both cases one still needs to subclass abstract connection classes in > > order to customize the way HTTP messages are constructed. > > > > I can take care of ensuring class name consistency across modules this > > weekend. > > OK. But I still feel it would be a good idea to factor out > the message header parsing from AbstractClientConnection > and, for sake of symmetry, AbstractServerConnection. > It would also serve people such as Jeroen, who would then > no longer need to create a fake connection in order to > parse data that is already in memory. > > cheers, > Roland >
Makes sense. I'll take care of that. Oleg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
