sebb wrote:
On 03/10/2007, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 18:26 +0100, sebb wrote:
Tried another build, having deleted the target directories:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test set: org.apache.http.nio.TestAll
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tests run: 108, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
27.328 sec <<< FAILURE!
testSimpleHttpPostsHTTP10(org.apache.http.nio.protocol.TestNIOHttp)
Time elapsed: 10.063 sec  <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<0> but was:<32>
      at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
      at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:282)
      at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:64)
      at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:201)
      at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:207)
      at 
org.apache.http.nio.protocol.TestNIOHttp.testSimpleHttpPostsHTTP10(TestNIOHttp.java:826)

testSimpleHttpHeads(org.apache.http.nio.protocol.TestNIOHttp)  Time
elapsed: 10.047 sec  <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<60> but was:<76>
      at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
      at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:282)
      at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:64)
      at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:201)
      at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:207)
      at 
org.apache.http.nio.protocol.TestNIOHttp.testSimpleHttpHeads(TestNIOHttp.java:1240)

But a second run (without deleting target) works OK.

Sebastian,

Would it be a big deal for you to pull out the latest snapshot off the
SVN trunk and re-run the tests?

OK, I'll try that later.

I had to remove test decorators that employ the more advanced throttling
versions of the protocol handlers instead of simpler buffering ones. I
am currently unable to test them properly as do not have a multicore box
at my disposal. Those protocol handlers seem to work well with both Java
1.5 and Java 1.4 on my old Pentium M box.

I guess I have to tell my wife she won't be able to check her emails and
browse her favorite news sites unless we upgrade our PC. Ehhh.

What's a bit odd though is that it says the NIOSSL tests succeed, even
though I'm running with Java 1.4:

That's OK. NIOSSL tests were not run. Otherwise it would have said
something like that

[INFO] HttpCore (NIO SSL extensions module) .................. SUCCESS
[5.480s]

Rather confusing - it should say NOT RUN or similar.

And why does it take 8 seconds to do nothing?


All right. Let me try it again. Please see the output below once again. There is no mentioning of NIO SSL anywhere (not to be confused with NIO extensions).


[INFO] Executing tasks
     [echo] =======================================================
     [echo] WARNING: Java 1.5 dependent modules are NOT included!
     [echo] =======================================================
[INFO] Executed tasks
[INFO]
[INFO]
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] HttpComponents Core ................................... SUCCESS [2.657s]
[INFO] HttpCore (base module) ................................ SUCCESS [2.656s]
[INFO] HttpCore (NIO extensions module) ...................... SUCCESS [8.078s]
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL


No mentioning of NIO SSL extensions. They were _not_ run. They were _excluded_ because of the JDK level (1.4).

Oleg

Sebb

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to