On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 23:57 +0200, Erik Krause wrote:
> enblend uses a not so optimal number of levels. specify -l 20 at the > enblend command line to increase the number to the maximum and you > get results similar to smartblend. enblend 3 should be almost as fast > as smartblend BTW... I still get fewer blending artifacts around the zenith with smartblend than with enblend, and using enblend's maximum number of blending levels doesn't affect this. E.g., compare the following two zeniths, the first created by enblend with -l 29, the second by smartblend at default settings: http://VictoriaVR.ca/test/enblend-zenith.jpg http://VictoriaVR.ca/test/smartblend-zenith.jpg There's still a slight artifact in the smartblended example, but it's barely noticeable, and much easier to patch satisfactorily than the enblend example. Cheers, BBB --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
