Am Wednesday 24 September 2008 schrieb cspiel: > > Michael - > > Michael Galloway wrote: > > is the segfault with enblend cvs resolved? > > At least I cannot reproduce it with the latest CVS version > on my machine > $ uname -a > Linux beliskner 2.4.36 #3 SMP Thu Feb 14 15:51:55 CET 2008 i686 > GNU/Linux > and my compiler > $ gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 4.3.2 > However, this doesn't prove the bug went away.
On my machine it is
Linux dell64 2.6.22.17-0.1-default #1 SMP 2008/02/10 20:01:04 UTC x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux
and here enblend still segfaults.
> Could you please give it a spin? If you run into a segfault
> a backtrace would be helpful.
I have a backtrace, but not very helpfull.
....
Reading symbols from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib64/libXau.so.6...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib64/libXau.so.6
Core was generated by `enblend -o xb0000.tif -v -m 400 -l 20 -w -a --fine-mask
--optimize xa0005.tif x'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x00000000004f676e in enblend::maskBounds<vigra::CachedFileImage<unsigned
char> > ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00000000004f676e in enblend::maskBounds<vigra::CachedFileImage<unsigned
char> > ()
#1 0x000000000063a17e in enblend::enblendMain<vigra::RGBValue<unsigned char,
0u, 1u, 2u> > ()
#2 0x0000000000408d42 in main ()
(gdb)
> Cheers,
> Chris
Kornel
--
Kornel Benko
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
