On Thu 23-Oct-2008 at 22:57 +0200, Harry van der Wolf wrote: > >I'm also interested in bracketed pano series where I find all performing >less good. > >My default is panomatic because it's fastest and gives good results, >especially at sky points. But celeste might be the solution there right now. >I only switch to match-n-shift and/or autopano-sift-c when panomatic doesn't >give good results.
If you use the match-n-shift --stacks option (available with the latest Panotools::Script 0.19), then it does a reasonable job with bracketed stacks. Though you need to use the camera's shutter-speed bracketing feature, and the shutter-speed needs to be in the photo EXIF, or the sequence will be treated as a 'normal' panorama. -- Bruno --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
