Hi Mötzli I always feel it takes to much fidling to do everything in one go in hugin. I shoot 27 images for a 360 panorama, and I always have to spend at least half an hour cleaning up control points or putting them in manually. If I put 4*27 images in hugin I'm busy all day :)
I make my panorama in hugin with the best exposed images. I make 3 other panorama's with the other bracketed sets using the 'File > Apply template' command in hugin. (i only optimize exposure for each panorama) Afterwards I run enfuse manually on the 4 panorama's with excellent results. Some other people on this list might have even better advice, but this works for me. hth Maurice On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Mötzli <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello to all, > > I need some help creating an enfused panorama. I followed Bruno's > great tutorial http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/enfuse-360/en.shtml > (Creating 360° enfused panoramas). My intension is to create"only" an > about 180° panorama, and I did not use a fisheye lens, but I guess > this doesn't make a big difference. > > I shot 24 images (8 bracketed shots with different exposure values). > As in the tutorial described, "I aligned each set of three bracketed > photos as a stack, then I picked just one picture from each of the > eight stacks and aligned these together just like a normal panorama." > So between the stacks, I only created control points for one exposure > value (+2EV in my case), but I didn't create control points for the 0 > EV and the -2EV. This is correct, is it? > > In the stitcher tab I set Blended panorama (enfuse) (which is > "Belichtungsfusion: Panorama" in German) and Blended exposure layers > (Einzelne Belichtungsebenen). I expect the blended exposure layers > option to create 3 panoramas for each EV, but I don't get this three > panoramas. Instead I get 14 different TIFFs: > - pano_exposure_00.tiff > - pano_exposure_01.tiff > - etc... pano_exposure_13.tiff > Some of them seem to be partial panoramas (e.g. the three left images > stitched together) , some of them seem to be a single enfused stack. > > Furthermore, I get the blended panorama (pano_fused.tiff), I t > actually doesn't look too bad, but there are highly visible seams > between at least 4 stacks, so I have the impression that enblend > didn't work too well? > > By the way, in the preview window, the panorama looks quite good, I > cannot find any seams there. > > Any ideas what went wrong? Thanks for any help! > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
