On Sun 21-Dec-2008 at 13:59 -0800, Mötzli wrote: > >Anyway, I think I understood now, why hugin didn't output three >panoramas but lots of ohter TIFs. It's because each picture has a >different exposure value in the camera and lens tab, right? This comes >from the exposure optimisation, I did. I tried setting them manually >to the same value vor each "layer", i.e. to 2 for the eight >overexposed pictures, to 0 for the eight well exposed pictures, and to >-2 for the eight underexposed pictures. Hugin gave me now 3 panoramas, >but the ugly seams were still there. I tried using other EV, too, but >the result was always the same.
Although hugin offers to give you 'exposure layers' and you get these three panoramas as a result, it doesn't actually use them to create the final image. hugin first identifies each stack and then exposure blends them together with enfuse, these stacks are then blended together 'normally' with enblend. The EV levels within the stacks are not critical, so hugin simply looks at the position of the images to determine if they are a 'stack'. These stacks are then deleted and there is no way to get hugin to save them using the GUI (currently). So this is why the result is ok despite the problems with the 'layers'. I would smooth the result by increasing the number of blending levels by adding '-l 29' to the 'enblend options'. -- Bruno --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
